Search for: "Liability and Insurers for Each Defendant, Defendant's"
Results 341 - 360
of 3,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2010, 9:57 am
In reaching this conclusion the court detailed each of several recognized bases for bad faith liability under Florida law. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:36 am
Zurich denied a duty to defend and indemnify Ms. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:49 pm
To be added to our email circulation with MUCH, MUCH more law, click here and specify whether you wish to be added to our CRIMINAL, CIVIL, HEALTH & INSURANCE, 11th CIRCUIT, or all FEDERAL Recent Decisions of Interest. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:43 am
This theory suggests that the defendant is not responsible for all of the damages because the plaintiff also bears some liability. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 6:55 am
That is the question that employers face each day in Connecticut and across the nation when it comes to Employment Practice Liability Insurance (EPLI, for short). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 3:00 am
Kimberly Perkins was insured by Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. for auto liability up to $25,000. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 7:43 am
Insurance companies that delay payment, after liability has been demonstrated in a car accident claim, may be assessed additional damages for their conduct. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm
The particular areas we’ll be covering include: •General liability and the duty to defend; •Employer Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI); •Directors and Officers Liability Insurance (D&O); and •Cyber Liability Policies. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:05 am
Defendants argued that since Plaintiff was compensated for his loss to the tune of $47,000 in insurance proceeds, he should not be permitted to recover anything. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:54 am
Defense counsel in each case essentially argued that the tortfeasors would be prejudiced by the introduction of evidence of insurance issues at trial and that severance was necessary to avoid this prejudice. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Insurance companies are for-profit corporations, and they rely on taking in more money in premiums each month than they pay out in claims. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 5:28 am
Specifically, Colony argued that because both policies contain excess-insurance clauses, liability for defending the underlying case should be pro-rated between the two insurers based on the long-standing rule that, where two insurance policies covering the same risk contain excess-insurance clauses, the clauses are mutually repugnant and the loss should be apportioned between the two insurers on a prorata basis. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am
Liability Insurance Livestock show organizations should also obtain liability insurance and ensure that the policy covers liability for injuries and illness, particularly as it applies to COVID-19. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 6:26 am
In addition, the court affirmed that "Louisiana law has consistently held that a liability insurer and its insured are co-debtors in solido," a term that means that two or more parties are each completely and equally responsible for what is owed. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 8:56 pm
Some background: Remember that in California, liability for non-economic damages (e.g., pain and suffering) is "several" (i.e., each defendant pays only for its share), while liability for economic damages is "joint and several" -- the plaintiff can recover all such damages from any defendant held liable, whether the defendant is 100% at fault or 1% or less at fault. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
Insurance companies are for-profit corporations, and they rely on taking in more money in premiums each month than they pay out in claims. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 6:18 am
Each depends on the facts of exactly what happened and the language in the policy at issue. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 10:39 am
So, who pays the amount that is no longer covered by the defendant’s insurance policy? [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:30 am
Then, if the defendant-insurer wishes to avoid liability by relying on a policy exclusion from coverage, it has the burden of persuasion to establish that the uncompensated or under-compensated damage is subject to an exclusion. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 2:36 am
These lawsuits are expensive to defend and they also potentially expose the individual to significant personal liability. [read post]
