Search for: "Lists of Jurors v."
Results 341 - 360
of 1,122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:13 am
R. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:53 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:16 am
Kays now challenges the final judgment alleging a juror was erroneously struck for cause; text and Facebook messages should have been excluded due to lack of authentication; his ex-wife should have been barred from testifying about confidential marital conversations; and, jurors should have received more sentencing information. . . .Kays v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 9:33 am
In the case, Suarez v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 9:33 am
In the case, Suarez v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:05 am
This long-needed impetus stems from the recent Supreme Court of Canada case of R. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:56 am
Today’s order list did, however, deny review in several noteworthy cases. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 5:07 pm
Supreme Court of Georgia Rules on Juror Questions Issue The Supreme Court of Georgia issued an opinion in Hernandez v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 5:24 am
After the EEOC moved for a new trial, in EEOC v JetStream Ground Services, Inc., Case No. 13-CV-02340 (D. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Derek Welsman, jury foreman in R. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:00 am
("Barry") and Medtronic approached trial, the district court informed the parties that it intended to provide the parties with a list of potential jurors to assist counsel in preparing for voir dire. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:13 am
" Barry v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 3:57 am
” In Education Week, Mark Walsh takes a look at Fry v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:27 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
In Warger v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Hasty v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:26 am
In so holding, the court distinguished Commissioner of Probation v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 7:10 am
The most noteworthy part of this morning’s order list was a per curiam decision in Bosse v. [read post]
