Search for: "Little v. Alexander" Results 341 - 360 of 478
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by Alexander J. Davie
Titles V and VI make it easier for companies to remain private (i.e., avoid having to become a public reporting company). [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
This is troubling to some California practitioners as the great weight of authority by courts and commentators has favored application of the business judgment rule to officers acting in their capacity as officers within the scope of their delegated authority.[5]      In most states, including California, Delaware and New York, despite the case law being sparse, there has been little dispute that the business judgment rule or BJR applies equally to corporate officers and… [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Well-known episodes such as the battle over Alexander Hamilton’s financial program, the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, Marbury v. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am by INFORRM
  Even Alexander Meiklejohn, the champion of free political expression, recognised that the First Amendment ‘is not the guardian of unregulated talkativeness’: ‘What is essential is not that everyone shall speak, but that everything worth saying shall be said’. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
Keith Alexander’s approach to surveillance as “Collect it all, tag it, store it… And whatever it is you want, you go searching for it. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:08 am by Susan Landau
The private sector has become the biggest repository of consumers’ private data with little or no reaction by the people concerned. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I therefore have little difficultly in agreeing with Darrell Miller’s laconic suggestion that Bruen represents a kind of “constitutional gnosticism” untethered by what we formerly viewed as ordinary modes of constitutional interpretation. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
  But it is ultimately unsatisfying because it does little to advance the formal legitimacy of the claims of the state or other entity to which aid is secreted. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Does it matter if it’s an attack on the economy, where there’s little physical damage, there’s just disruption? [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 12:29 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
Kluwer IP Law asked two experts, Alexander Robinson of Dehns and Pieter Callens of Eubelius, co-author of The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court whether time is running out for the UP system. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:57 am by chief
 Now, we have encountered r.13 before (see our note on Willow Court v Alexander here). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 [T]he determination under comment k that the design of a product is unavoidably unsafe and yet affords benefits outweighing its risks varies little from the determination under negligence law that the designing and marketing of the product was reasonably done. . . . [read post]