Search for: "Long v. California"
Results 341 - 360
of 10,915
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 12:13 pm
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
Raicevic v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
The decision in Almond Alliance et al. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:10 am
by Michael Kun The other day, an attorney told me he believes that the decade-long wave of misclassification class actions in California is all but over. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 7:38 am
-v.-17-2022-.pdf The volume is edited by the remarkable Selma Moidel Smith, who at 103 years old is at long last retiring from her editorship of the journal. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:50 pm
Aniel v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm
V. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:15 am
Kibel v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:40 am
Lampert (August 15, 2019) the California Supreme Court answers a question I long ago quit wondering about: whether a conversion claim is cognizable for unpaid wages. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:27 pm
See Windsor v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
(People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:05 am
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 11:19 am
One of the cases, Kilby v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:51 am
Co-authored by Jeffrey Berman, Dana Peterson, and Brandon McKelvey The California Supreme Court announced today that it will issue its decision at 10:00 a.m. tomorrow in the much-anticipated meal and rest period case of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:24 am
(Loder v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 12:48 pm
(SUTL) imposes sales and use taxes on retailers and purchasers for the sale, use, storage, or consumption of tangible personal property within California. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:22 am
” Wilson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 1:00 am
Foley v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:28 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California: Ravenwood School District v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 1:06 pm
The California Supreme Court’s 2018 landmark decision, Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
