Search for: "Long v. Perry"
Results 341 - 360
of 789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
Perry v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:22 pm
And since I had nothing better to do after a week long vacation, I thought it would be nice to annotate and analyze the eight paragraph motion for my unfaithful readers to help them understand what really transpired between Jose Baez and Robin Lunceford. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:54 am
Stone v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
Stone v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
However, the long-term implications of this case aren’t entirely clear because the Supreme Court voted 3-1-3: three justices on a plurality opinion, 3 justices (in 2 opinions) in dissent, and a swing-vote concurrence by Justice Kruger. [read post]
Argument preview: Justices to consider constitutionality of cross-shaped war memorial on public land
21 Feb 2019, 10:37 am
In 1971, in a case called Lemon v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:10 pm
Exchange v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 12:02 pm
DiLoreto v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:11 pm
By Mike Dorf Understandably, most of the news coverage of Perry v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 6:11 am
Perry (the challenge to Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:00 am
See, e.g., Galey, 510 F.3d at 532; Perry v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
We’ve been covering the United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm
When the justices started their last week of arguments this morning with Lucia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
Chief Justice John Roberts announces that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has the court’s opinion in Perry v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 5:10 pm
NLRB, 712 F.2d 306, 311 (7th Cir. 1983); In re Perry, 859 F.2d 1043 (1st Cir. 1988); NLRB v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 11:24 am
’” In Gill v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
Schwarzenegger (now Perry v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm
Assn. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:59 am
In Gessa v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:48 pm
Google v Viacom Also in the last week, a number of key documents were released by the court that is hearing Viacom’s long-running copyright infringement case against Google’s YouTube. [read post]
