Search for: "Louisiana v. Jones"
Results 341 - 360
of 420
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
In my previous blog entry, I posted my proposal for amendments to the Indian Child Welfare Act. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
" Jones v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 10:01 pm
Torres v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Louisiana, 18-5924, presents the question whether the 14th Amendment incorporates the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a unanimous verdict in criminal cases. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:45 am
Jones, 985 S.W.2d 485, 489 (Tex. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Kaushal v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
In Hurst v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
Whether the rational basis standard of review should be used to evaluate DOMA is also before Judge Barbara Jones of the Southern District of New York in Windsor v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nail v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 10:05 pm
Let’s say that you have a case that you previously handled called Smith v Acme and now you have a new case called Jones v Acme. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Soon afterwards, the states of Texas, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, and Nebraska filed suit, arguing that the definition that the actuarial group adopted “foist[ed] nearly $500 million of taxes” onto the states in just three years because of a fee that the Affordable Care Act imposed (but which was repealed in 2019). [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 8:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
That law applies to rail workers; the issue also arises under the Jones Act, for seaman. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
Circuit’s al-Bihani v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Eddins & Lee Bus Sales, Inc., 491 So.2d 942, 944 (Ala. 1986); Jones v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Jones, concurring: But we were wrong! [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Louisiana, 128 S.Ct. 1203 (2008), petitioner is entitled to a COA in connection with his Batson claims in respect to two potential jurors. [read post]
