Search for: "M/V LORD"
Results 341 - 360
of 915
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
The importance of national precedent in such situations, per Lord Bingham in Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10, was crucial. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm
See too Re Bakhshiyeva v Sberbank of Russia [2019] Bus LR 1130 (CA); [2018] EWCA 2802. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
On 6 and 7 November 2019 the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) heard the appeal in the case of W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am
M accepted the offer and requested a review. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am
M accepted the offer and requested a review. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 3:27 am
This is the second of three blogs examining the recent UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco[1]. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:14 am
In the third (and final) of our blogs reporting on the UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco, we examine the findings in relation to non-use revocation. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:36 am
Abigail v Lapin [1934] AC 491. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:31 pm
That view would, I think, be wrong, since we all now know that s.85(4) as unamended did not require strict compliance (see Knowsley HT v White and other appeals [2008] UHKL 70) nor does it even have to be “substantial compliance” (per Lord Mance, in the minority in Knowsley) but the extent to which compliance is necessary is a matter for the judge in each case (per Lord Neuberger, Knowsley, [107]). [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:42 pm
’ (per Lord Justice Purchas, Hunt v R M Douglas (Roofing) Ltd, 18 November 1987, CA, unreported. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 10:28 pm
This was particularly troubling when, in the words of Lord Justice McGonigal, the counter-terrorism law then in force ‘leaves it open to an interviewer to use a moderate degree of physical maltreatment for the purpose of inducing a person to make a statement’ (R v McCormick (1977) NI 105, 111). [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Mazurek, John M. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:05 pm
There is one media and information case listed before the Supreme Court this term 13 and 14 November 2018, Lachaux v Independent Print (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs). [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 2:04 am
I’m not permitted to write about that. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Ian M. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Ian M. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:58 am
Article 8 has had a great impact on UK law on investigatory powers (Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act) and on family law (Tchenguiz v Imerman). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:50 pm
Craig Lord, James R. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 8:07 pm
And more good news: his first in the series, Solomon v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:03 pm
Lord knows the University has had enough negative labour relations in the news lately. [read post]
