Search for: "M/V Lord"
Results 341 - 360
of 914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
The importance of national precedent in such situations, per Lord Bingham in Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10, was crucial. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm
See too Re Bakhshiyeva v Sberbank of Russia [2019] Bus LR 1130 (CA); [2018] EWCA 2802. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
On 6 and 7 November 2019 the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) heard the appeal in the case of W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am
M accepted the offer and requested a review. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am
M accepted the offer and requested a review. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 3:27 am
This is the second of three blogs examining the recent UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco[1]. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:14 am
In the third (and final) of our blogs reporting on the UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco, we examine the findings in relation to non-use revocation. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:36 am
Abigail v Lapin [1934] AC 491. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:31 pm
That view would, I think, be wrong, since we all now know that s.85(4) as unamended did not require strict compliance (see Knowsley HT v White and other appeals [2008] UHKL 70) nor does it even have to be “substantial compliance” (per Lord Mance, in the minority in Knowsley) but the extent to which compliance is necessary is a matter for the judge in each case (per Lord Neuberger, Knowsley, [107]). [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:42 pm
’ (per Lord Justice Purchas, Hunt v R M Douglas (Roofing) Ltd, 18 November 1987, CA, unreported. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 10:28 pm
This was particularly troubling when, in the words of Lord Justice McGonigal, the counter-terrorism law then in force ‘leaves it open to an interviewer to use a moderate degree of physical maltreatment for the purpose of inducing a person to make a statement’ (R v McCormick (1977) NI 105, 111). [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Mazurek, John M. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:05 pm
There is one media and information case listed before the Supreme Court this term 13 and 14 November 2018, Lachaux v Independent Print (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs). [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 2:15 pm
Don’t get me wrong I’m all for Lord of the Flies, but this is different than saying that artists with financial means don’t selectively identify artists that don’t have access to power and money. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 2:04 am
I’m not permitted to write about that. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Ian M. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:50 pm
Craig Lord, James R. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Ian M. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:58 am
Article 8 has had a great impact on UK law on investigatory powers (Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act) and on family law (Tchenguiz v Imerman). [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 8:07 pm
And more good news: his first in the series, Solomon v. [read post]
