Search for: "M/V Lord"
Results 341 - 360
of 914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2015, 1:34 am
.* US judge denies copyright over 3-word phrase ‘Everyday I’m Hustlin’’A few weeks ago, the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida had to determine whether dance pop duo LMFAO had infringed rapper Rick Ross’s copyright by using catch-phrase ‘Everyday I’m Shufflin’’ for merchandising. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:44 am
I’m normally near the front, floating on a lagoon of dark suits, but today I’m at the back, giving ground to the crowd. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
I’m willing to bet that, if I gave every one of you a piece of paper and a pencil and asked you to make your own list of ten, no two people would emerge with the same list. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am
On 8 October 2015 Sir Michael Tugendhat heard an appeal from the Master in the case of Bates v Leeds United FC . [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:31 am
Focus here on clusters of issues: Formalism v. realism. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[v] Justice Anthony M. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
It was only a few years since Seager v Copydex: in two seminal Court of Appeal rulings, Lord Denning established both that the hitherto equitable doctrine that a breach of confidence might be restrained was in fact an “equitable tort” and that a court might award compensatory damages just as it would for the commission of any other tort. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:29 am
For those interested I recommend reading Vice Chancellor Noble’s 2013 opinion in Blaustein v Lord Baltimore Capital Corp. which I wrote about here. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:09 am
(Hint: you won’t find any, because the majority hoisted themselves into that claimed “power” by their own bootstraps.)Oh, no, I'm not saying she, individually, gets to define what is proper marriage.Let’s review what you actually said, shall we? [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
This point includes relevant text of a recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Eweida and Others v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:55 am
And I guess a more articulate way of thinking about it is that Brady v. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm
See A and B v Rotherham MBC [2014] EWFC 47 Fam. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
This was an issue extensively explored by the House of Lords in British Leyland Motor Corp v Armstrong Patents Company Ltd [1986]albeit in the context of the 1956 Copyright Act. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm
(I'm laughing right now. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:19 pm
.: Today, before a packed Supreme Court audience, Justice Anthony M. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:45 am
But there we go – that is the “Carrollian” effect of the rule to which both Lord Neuberger and Baroness Hale referred. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am
That was on the basis of the House of Lords decision in Din v Wandsworth LBC and the Court of Appeal decision in Dyson v Kerrier DC. [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:18 am
Garcia v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Lord Neuberger reviewed a long list of authorities of the House of Lords, the Privy Council and that of the Court of Appeal in Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar NP [1984] FSR 413, 462. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:07 am
Lady Hale and Lord Toulson had no such qualms. [read post]
