Search for: "M. HALE" Results 341 - 360 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2018, 2:04 pm by Ruby Powers
. Şirket bir avukatla birlikte, davanızı daha güçlü hale getirebilecek ve olumlu bir sonuç alma şansınızı artırabilecek önemli ve gerekli kanıtları toplamak için birlikte çalışır. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by NL
The view of Lady Hale in M v Slough 'has commanded general acceptance', citing: I remain of the view which I expressed in Wahid [2003] HLR 2, at para 32, that the natural and ordinary meaning of the words 'care and attention' in this context is 'looking after'. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by NL
The view of Lady Hale in M v Slough 'has commanded general acceptance', citing: I remain of the view which I expressed in Wahid [2003] HLR 2, at para 32, that the natural and ordinary meaning of the words 'care and attention' in this context is 'looking after'. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:29 pm by Keith Gerver
”  Kammen indicated that while he’s not at liberty to discuss al-Nashiri’s health, even though he might appear “hale and hearty,” the “truth” is “sometimes less obvious. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:02 am by Clare Montgomery QC, Matrix
This was one of the issues that was (as Lord Hope explained) decided in Watson v M’Ewan? [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm by NL
As per Lady Hale (as she was) in R (M) v Slough London Borough Council [2008] 1 WLR 1808, at para 36: “Although M is HIV positive, his medical needs are being catered for by the National Health Service so, even if they did amount to a need for care and attention within the meaning of section 21(1)(a), he would not qualify, but, for the reasons given above, I do not think that they amount to such a need … as he does not fall within section 21(1)(a) it is unnecessary to… [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:29 pm by INFORRM
I’m afraid this puts me in mind of judges dancing on the head of a pin. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm by NL
As per Lady Hale (as she was) in R (M) v Slough London Borough Council [2008] 1 WLR 1808, at para 36: “Although M is HIV positive, his medical needs are being catered for by the National Health Service so, even if they did amount to a need for care and attention within the meaning of section 21(1)(a), he would not qualify, but, for the reasons given above, I do not think that they amount to such a need … as he does not fall within section 21(1)(a) it is… [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:03 pm by Jay Shepherd
I’m not going to talk about my presentation here — suffice to say it included references to Blade Runner, cannibalistic English food, and Hale and Dorr’s WilmerHale’s invention of the billable hour in 1919. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm by Dave
 So, I’m an impure property lawyer and quite proud of it. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 8:30 am by azatty
So if I have a messy desk, I’m a genius like Steve Jobs? [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:24 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
   In an excellent law review on this issue, law professor Angela Laughlin presents the following table outlining the positions taken by other courts: Angela M. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 10:53 am by Jeff Gamso
  Sometimes, as with Nathan Hale, the last words were of defiance. [read post]