Search for: "MARCH v. PETER"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2020, 6:31 am
Posted by Kevin Harnisch (Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP) and David Ho and Nepomuk Loesti (American International Group, Inc.), on Friday, March 6, 2020 Tags: Extraterritoriality, Foreign issuers, International governance, Liability standards, Morrison v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
In advance of oral argument before the Supreme Court scheduled for March 2, this post examines key arguments and points of contention in this case, explains the interests at stake and offers predictions for how the Supreme Court will rule. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 4:27 am
Which law firms represented which parties, how did that change and is there privity are the questions raised and answered in Binn v Muchnick, Golieb & Golieb, P.C. 2019 NY Slip Op 30568(U) March 5, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158105/2017. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The ubiquitous R v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 6:29 am
You might recall that this case took on a heightened significance when, in March 2018, SCOTUS held, in Cyan Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
The IPKat is glad to say Retromark will be returning for its third year with another afternoon of trade mark law and practice on Tuesday 24 March 2020! [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 7:19 pm
In the case of Circuitronix, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am
[vi] Peter L. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am
[vi] Peter L. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
Previously, of course, the inspector general was critical of political text messages exchanged between FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page, and the Crossfire Hurricane report goes out of its way to note this (id. at iii; see, e.g., id. at 9, 67). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:52 pm
Flood v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
In my previous post in this series, I argued (yet again) that Collins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March 2013) was wrongly decided. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:50 pm
Recently, in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 7:38 am
Case date: 27 March 2019 Case number: [2019] UKSC 15 Court: Supreme Court of the United Kingdom A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:50 am
Miquel MontañáOur friends from the EPLAW Patent Blog recently published an interesting blog commenting on the judgment of 29 March 2019 from the Court of Appeal of Barcelona (Section 15) where, among other aspects, the requirements for requesting the limitation of a European patent before the Spanish Patents and Trademarks Office (“SPTO”) were discussed. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
Blondin v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 5:48 am
’ In Stjerna’s constitutional complaint, filed late March 2017, he had already set out why he himself is convinced the UPCA is unconstitutional. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In its well-known decision of Illinois v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
