Search for: "MARKS v. STATE"
Results 341 - 360
of 21,462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2011, 7:51 am
Sukumar v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 6:04 pm
Eleven months after ruling that taxing damage awards for nonphysical compensatory damages violated the United States Constitution, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has reversed itself in Murphy v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:54 am
No, says the Dutch Court of Appeal in The Hague, although its reasoning is a little creative when it comes to its application of EU trade mark law.The decision is Zhu v Great Blue Sky Internationaland dates back to December 2013. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:59 pm
linkSomerset, Red was assigned to Republican states in the annual election night maps used by the TV networks. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:11 pm
The result is that the scope of patentable subject matter is certainly narrowed from its 1998 high-water-mark. * * * * * In Bilski v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:11 pm
Davis and Moore v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
On September 21, 2010, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) insider-trading case against Mark Cuban (“Cuban”) and remanded the case for further proceedings. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 2:24 am
Omega SA (Omega AG) (Omega LTD.) v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 10:05 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:13 pm
This can no longer be allowed in view of the comments in Bovemij Verzekeringen NV v Benelux Merkenbureau, Case C-108/05 [EUROPOLIS], which makes clear that the mark must be distinctive in the whole of the territory of the member state [Merpel would like a little clarification here: is this what Bovemij clearly established?]. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
December 11, 2022, marked the centennial of the U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
Sukumar v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 8:36 am
Mark Spognardi Jesse Dill Arnstein & Lehr Chicago Partner Mark A. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
Should this be true, the GC stated, Nike would have initially owned the Spanish non-registered trade mark at issue and no transfer of ownership from DL Sports would have taken place. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:56 am
Slevin Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
June 12th marks the anniversary of the US Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in the civil rights case Loving v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
That attack sent one of the men to the hospital and landed Wahlberg in prison.In this Dec. 15, 2014 photo, Mary Belmonte reviews newspaper clippings she had collected about Mark …Wahlberg, in a pardon application filed in November and pending before the state parole board, acknowledges he was a teenage delinquent mixed up in drugs, alcohol and the wrong crowd. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 1:51 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:49 am
Josephs v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:09 am
Here’s the abstract: In Hughes v. [read post]
