Search for: "MARSHALL v. MARSHALL" Results 341 - 360 of 6,317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2023, 8:00 am by Eleonora Rosati
We will explore the legal and practical meaning and consider if there are better ways to decide trade mark disputes)Moderator: Darren MealePanellists:  Rhys Edwards, Senior Legal Counsel, Monzo BankChristine Wang, Legal Director, Marshall AmplificationSimon Malynicz KC, Barrister, Hogarth ChambersChehrazade Chemcham, Vice President, Head of Brand Rights, Haleon18:15-19:30 – Drinks and canapesTickets are strictly limited and available on a first come, first served… [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:28 am by Will Baude
Here is Chief Justice Marshall's opinion of the Court in Bank of the U.S. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
” In my view, Judge Marshall erred in the sweeping scope of the order. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
FootnotesFootnote 1: To the extent that petitioner now challenges the denial of his original request for all trooper disciplinary records statewide, that claim is unpreserved as it was not raised in the petition (see Matter of Urena v Mulligan, 201 AD3d 1215, 1218 [3d Dept 2022]; Marshall v City of Albany, 184 AD3d 1043, 1044 [3d Dept 2020]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
FootnotesFootnote 1: To the extent that petitioner now challenges the denial of his original request for all trooper disciplinary records statewide, that claim is unpreserved as it was not raised in the petition (see Matter of Urena v Mulligan, 201 AD3d 1215, 1218 [3d Dept 2022]; Marshall v City of Albany, 184 AD3d 1043, 1044 [3d Dept 2020]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:49 am by Emma Snell
Marshall Cohen, Sara Murray and Annie Grayer report for CNN. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
  In relation to the evidence, Arnold LJ found that Neo’s application failed on the first criterion set out in Ladd v Marshall. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:51 am by Ben Allums and David L. Reisman
Passed in 1851, the Limitation of Liability Act allows a vessel owner to limit liability for damage or injury, occasioned without the owner’s privity or knowledge, to the post-casualty value of the vessel plus any pending freight.[13] The Act also contains a concursus procedure whereby all claims are marshaled into a single “limitation action” before a federal court sitting in admiralty; claimants are typically enjoined from suing the owner outside the limitation… [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:59 am by SHG
So when religious accommodation was on the table in Trans World Airlines v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States, Sarah Friedman on  Hansberry v. [read post]