Search for: "MATTER OF B L O"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm
ROBERT L. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:11 pm
Daniel Kazhdan, Obviousness-Type Double Patenting: Why It Exists and When It Applies, 53 AKRON L. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
McCalmont, Janna L. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:54 pm
L. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
Not a matter of pro-publisher and anti-author. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
Additionally, the Family Court properly included the children as protected persons on the order of protection, as the evidence demonstrated that doing so was “necessary to further the purposes of protection” (Family Ct Act § 842[l]; see Matter of Lengiewicz v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am
McGeveran: point out the small-l liberal supposition that there is a true self making pure choices. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
L. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 12:20 pm
" b. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Holyfield, 490 U.S. at 36, 109 S.Ct. 1597; see 25 USC ' 1911[b]). [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
LEXIS 97766, CV-08-267-B-W (D. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm
Int'l, 2009 U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
L. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2004 (1935).Schor, Juliet B. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
Harris, Lisa B. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 10:26 am
Anyhow, §43(a)(1)(B) “is broad enough to support, in the context of non-profit fundraising, a claim of false and misleading statements about the services represented by a protected mark. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
In sum, no matter how bad a job the Grouper does, it can hardly do worse than the current procedure. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am
Oprah Winfrey’s O: Own Your Power events. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:39 am
" -Enrique O. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 3:11 am
Of course, most of these decisions are not precedential, but we know that even non-precedential decisions may be helpful in framing effective arguments and locating precedential support for them.Section 2(a) provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o trademark by which the goods of the applicant may be distinguished from the goods of others shall be refused registration on the principal register on account of its nature unless it (a) consists of or comprises . . . matter which… [read post]
