Search for: "MATTER OF H C R" Results 341 - 360 of 1,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2019, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
Luckily (or unluckily) the CJEU has finally handed down its judgment very recently.As a short primer, the case of Pelham GmbH v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider‑Esleben concerned the song "Metall auf Metall" created by the band Kraftwerk, which comprises of the respondents Hütter and Schneider‑Esleben. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 4:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
"Upon approval by above-mentioned parties, the club is considered a registered organization of F[ordham] C[ollege] L[incoln] C[enter] and G[abelli] S[chool of] B[usiness]. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
It all seemed so easy and  matter-of-fact in retrospect, as Rose recalls: When [the whole roasted hog] was done, I served it up. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:23 am by Vishnu Kannan
Border Patrol; Jonathan H. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:39 am by Vishnu Kannan
DiPietro, Chief Technology Officer, United States Secret Service; and Charles H. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Radack then apparently settled the original case, and Tweeted this about the matter: Since April 2018, I have been involved in litigation with Trevor Fitzgibbon. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
If there is an actual conflict of interest, then we are unable to represent either party, and we withdraw from (or decline to commence) representation. c. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:15 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Working sessions Working sessions K: Grievances Concerning Pure Academic Matters Part 2. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
But the dispositive legal issues in the case may have ramifications that go beyond the employment context because they involve matters of common-law contract law; specifically, the element of a meeting of the minds in the absence of a formal written contract executed by both parties. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:21 am by MOTP
May 16, 2019, no pet. h)(majority opinion)(dissenting opinion).The First Court of Appeals today decided a dispute over who should bear the loss for damages caused by a sophisticated international scam involving a counterfeit cashier’s check (a purported settlement check) deposited into an attorney’s IOLTA account at Cadence Bank. [read post]