Search for: "MATTER OF J C B"
Results 341 - 360
of 3,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
Under Schedule 3 paragraph 4(2)(b) of the TMA 1994, it is set out that:“(2) it is not an infringement of — [...] [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:25 am
(a) Warby J (b) Sir Michael Tugendhat (c) HHJ Richard Parkes QC (d) Sir David Eady (17) Who was incorrectly described on the Judiciary website as a judge sitting in the Family Division? [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
The editors’ decision on all matters relating to the quiz is, as usual, final. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 3:39 am
Rev. 1489John C. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
J.), the court addressed discovery disputes involving the apportionment of expert witness fees in a medical malpractice matter. [read post]
26 May 2020, 4:17 pm
Fifthly, and in any event, Warby J would have found that each Defendant could avail themselves of the defence of “reasonableness” set out in s 1(3)(c) of the PHA 1997 – for substantially the same reasons as it was found that their conduct did not constitute harassment (at [112], [113(8)]). [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:25 am
¶ 5(b). [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:48 am
He was initially placed in Band B. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:48 am
He was initially placed in Band B. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Martoche, J.), entered April 14, 2023, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Martoche, J.), entered April 14, 2023, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:27 am
Wanda J. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Merritt B. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
And so the matter came to hearing. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
The matter should be left to Parliament to resolve. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:19 pm
C. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 2:55 pm
— Donald J. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 8:12 pm
However, it appears that in publishing these advertisements Facebook has also committed an offence under s 328A(1) as: (a) Facebook has caused or permitted the electoral advertisement to be published on the internet; (b) the electoral advertisement is intended to affect voting in the election; (c) the electoral advertisement has been paid for by another person (ie. it does not matter that Facebook has not paid for the advertisement); (d)… [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 9:17 am
But, in a Chevron world, that's girlie-man agency discretion not military deference, JO'C, I'd say the portions I read are fairly clear that the JAG did NOT intend to alter the previous policy of no A-C relationship being created at pre-mast counseling. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Canada (Attorney general) [1989] 1 SCR 342SOPINKA J. [read post]
