Search for: "MATTER OF R T" Results 341 - 360 of 53,762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Since the last set of claims still contained unsearched subject-matter, this set of claims had been considered as inadmissible on the basis of R 46(1) and R 112 EPC 1973 in conjunction with opinion G 2/92. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The definition of the catalyst is found in page 4, lines 5 t 6 of the original description: “The catalyst of the process according to the invention contains a support, platinum and at least one further element. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 7:03 pm
 Over at Popehat, Ken White has a helpful post explaining the ways in which this alleged robbery does and does not matter legally (mostly not), and why it likely does (but shouldn’t) matter practically. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 11:30 pm
 Regular old cuddly Covid19 had an R value of 3, meaning that for every person that became infected, they infected three other people, unless they worked in the White House under the prior administration, when their R value was double, because they didn't believe in masks, or Covid19 for that matter. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 5:00 am by eileen peck
He also said he would refrain from further comment on the matter. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
R 44 EPC 1973), this concerns the content of the European search report. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
In its communication dated 20 May 2009 the Board noted that due to the above-mentioned situation the notice of appeal appeared to contain an inconsistency concerning the name/identity of the appellant (R 101(2) and R 99(1)(a)), which has to be a registered party to the opposition proceedings (A 107) and a legal entity still existing at the filing date of the notice of appeal (T 525/94). [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:07 am by Jim Chen
No matter how substantially a proposed merger may lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly, competitors of the combining firms face formidable barriers that often prevent them from suing under section 4 or section 16 of the Clayton Act. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 5:48 am by Rasha Zeyadeh
The post Implicit Bias in the Workplace – Just Because it isn’t Blatant, Does Not Mean it isn’t There appeared first on Dallas Employment Lawyer Blog. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It does not matter in what form the subject of the appeal is identified, as long as it is clear. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:43 am
  Profit is not determined on an hour by hour or matter by matter basis. [read post]