Search for: "MATTER OF S C B C and J C"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2007, 1:04 pm
Inventor's oath or declaration.Sec. 5. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
Inventor's oath or declaration.Sec. 5. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:40 pm
Inventor's oath or declaration.Sec. 5. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:48 pm
Id. at (b) & (c). [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 6:15 pm
(c) If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
For this week’s Guest Post Friday here at Construction Law Musings, we welcome Author J. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am
Infringement – applying the Doctrine of Equivalents At paragraph 304 Birss J noted that “neither party devoted much effort” to a point on added matter and, likewise, this note does not consider the point further. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:12 pm
§ 331(j). [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:33 am
Floyd J’s latest decision in the matter was handed down yesterday. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:40 am
§546(c). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
This is in line with decisions T 842/90 and J 20/00 where it was considered possible that the payment of an additional fee amounting to [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
The ED was of the opinion that the subject-matter of claim 1 contained surgical steps and as such was excluded from patentability.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation):Method for determining the change or change in length of a first object (b) which is connected in an initial state to a second object (d) via a joint (k) and which has been changed after having been detached from the second object (d), wherein a reference system (e1) is attached… [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
Defendant will move to exclude statements by, and evidence obtained from, Defendant during the State's investigation of this case because the statements and evidence (a) create substantial danger of undue prejudice to Defendant contrary to Evid.R. 403 (previously Evid.R.4), (b) are privileged under Evid.R. 503 (previously Evid.R. 25), and (c) were obtained contrary to U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 10:52 am
As we wrote in one of our prior posts about John O’Brien:[It] seems odd for a corporate — er, “general practice” — partner at S&C to get in trouble over a tax matter. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Why context matters: defining service animals under federal law. 37 Pepp. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 5:31 am
It's déjà vu all over again! [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 4:05 am
Do They Matter? [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:57 am
" Leschins asked for "the opportunity to speak with" the carrier about "resolution [of the matter] in an amicable fashion," and at the carrier's "earliest convenience. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:08 am
" Leschins asked for "the opportunity to speak with" the carrier about "resolution [of the matter] in an amicable fashion," and at the carrier's "earliest convenience. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Bill C-78 at ss 7.2, 7.3 and 16, and BC FLA at ss 4, 37, 38 and 199(1)(2)(b)). [read post]
