Search for: "MATTER OF T A AND T R A"
Results 341 - 360
of 53,769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2009, 5:53 pm
THE REASON FOR OBAMA’S THIN SKIN: “It truly didn’t matter what anyone said about W, because he had such a firmly established core being, it matters utterly what the critics say about the UR’s clothes, because there is no emperor. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:14 am
"It does not matter. [read post]
15 May 2011, 3:01 pm
The appellant had implicitly acknowledged this contradiction by limiting the claims to signed data […]. iii) The advantages linked to the new features (b) and (c) were not related in any obvious way to avoiding an unauthorised manipulation, which was the only problem mentioned in the description, and the Guidelines for examination (C-IV 9.8.2) did not allow a corresponding reformulation of the problem […].[3] R 86(4) EPC 1973 lays down that amended claims may not relate to (1)… [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:52 am
I have written about it in Europe, and readers have replied that it is simply a matter of immigrants. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
It is part of the professional task of representatives to decide independently – that is, without assistance from the Board – how to pursue their cases (see T 506/91 [2.3] cited with approval in R 11/08 [10]). [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 5:56 pm
RADLEY BALKO: Why “Reading The Bill” Won’t Matter. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
In case of doubt the board had, so the argument, no choice according to T 1505/06 [3.1] but to remit the case. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 1:37 am
The board thus considers, arguendo, the corresponding case law (see Case Law, V.A.4.10.1, in particular T 1914/12, point 7.2.3) to be good law. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 12:29 pm
Institute), Christoph Knill (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München - Political Science), & Yves Steinebach (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München - Political Science) have published A Matter of Style: Organizational Agency in Global Public Policy (Cambridge Univ. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
T 64/02). [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:51 am
Didn't think so. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 1:17 am
In this appeal, the Board agrees with the appellant's argument that the subject-matter of claim 1 involves at least some technical features which are not regarded as notorious knowledge of the skilled person. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:38 am
CROWD ESTIMATE: ‘One Nation’ Rally: Liberal Media Concludes Size Doesn’t Matter. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
T 727/00 [1.1.4], T 686/99 [4.3]).Auxiliary request 1[2.2] The reasons under [2.1] also apply to claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 because this claim contains all the features of the main request that are relevant for the above argumentation […].Auxiliary request 2[2.3.1] In claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 the insecticide was further limited to the compound imidacloprid […]. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:59 pm
A recent case before the Technical Board of Appeal (T 1780/12) has shed some light on its meaning. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 1:14 am
"Only the claims determine the extent of protection" (r. 3.16). [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
In this examination appeal, the Board held - deviating from T 1265/10 - that regardless of whether or not the EPO would have access to sufficient the funds of the party intending to pay, such an intention can never be considered equivalent to an order.Referring to R 18/13, the Board further found that - different from a mistake made by an assistant - the mistake made by the representative to not explicitly instruct his assistant to pay the appeal fee and to not properly review… [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
In this examination appeal, the Board held - deviating from T 1265/10 - that regardless of whether or not the EPO would have access to sufficient the funds of the party intending to pay, such an intention can never be considered equivalent to an order.Referring to R 18/13, the Board further found that - different from a mistake made by an assistant - the mistake made by the representative to not explicitly instruct his assistant to pay the appeal fee and to not properly review… [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 5:02 am
She says "By 2039, the Supreme Court basically doesn’t matter anymore," but I guess it all depends on what "doesn't matter" means. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
If you are happy with a short take-away, here is the headnote of the decision: “A decision as referred to in R 111(2) should in principle be complete and self-contained and be comprehensible. [read post]
