Search for: "MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JOHNSON T" Results 341 - 360 of 494
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2011, 6:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Today in the Community we are discussing affirmative action in the context of the petition for certiorari in Fisher v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
The judgment in Johnson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Dep’t of the Treasury Docket No. 11-45   Issue: Whether the Civil Service Reform Act impliedly precludes federal district courts from having jurisdiction over constitutional claims for equitable relief brought by federal employees. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am by SHG
This situation is to be "distinguished from an unlawful procedure or error in" the action or proceeding "itself related to the proper purpose of" the action or proceeding (Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d at 64; see Matter of Johnson v Torres, 259 AD2d 370). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm by Kevin Johnson
Johnson,  Dean of the UC Davis School of Law and Mabie-Apallas Professor of Public Interest Law and Chicana/o Studies. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:46 am by Adam Wagner
If they were not, it is likely that this was due to a lack of understanding of the law on the part of the homeowners or the police, who apparently considered these to be civil law matters. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
Johnson & Johnson (Chicago IP Litigation) Minemyer – Court refuses ‘back door’ attempt at claim construction: Minemyer v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:24 am by Christopher S. Jones
§ 4) state the following in relevant part regarding petitions to compel arbitration:   A party aggrieved by the alleged failure, neglect, or refusal of another to arbitrate under a written agreement for arbitration may petition any United States district court which, save for such agreement, would have jurisdiction …for an order directing that such arbitration proceed in the manner provided for in such agreement. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  Everybody agreed that the defendant had been misinformed, but the State argued that the defendant couldn’t show that he wouldn’t have entered the plea if he hadn’t been given the information about judicial release. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:16 am
Johnson, whose ImmigrationProf blog post on this issue is here) [read post]