Search for: "Major C. Davis"
Results 341 - 360
of 735
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
The regulation at issue in this case is 130 CMR 520.023(C): (C) Irrevocable Trusts. (1) Portion Payable. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
The regulation at issue in this case is 130 CMR 520.023(C): (C) Irrevocable Trusts. (1) Portion Payable. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:04 am
My colleague, attorney David C. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 5:34 pm
The president of the firm, Robin C. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, less than an hour after the Supreme Court announced Justice Scalia’s death, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell tweeted: “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 8:05 am
The looming expiry of DRIPA also appears to be behind the EU Court of Justice’s attempt to speedily hear a challenge to the regime’s legality brought by MPs David Davis and Tom Watson. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 7:21 am
I remember one of my professors, James C. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
Likewise, Rule 46 of the AAA, entitled "Form of Award," states, (a) Any award shall be in writing and signed by a majority of the arbitrators. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:22 am
Bell, Fenwick & West LLP, on Tuesday, February 2, 2016 Tags: Board composition, Board declassification, Board leadership, Boards of Directors, Classified boards, Corporate governance, Diversity, Dual-class stock, Executive ownership, Majority voting, Outside directors, Public firms, Shareholder proposals, Surveys, Tech companies 2015 Year-End Securities Litigation Update Posted by Jonathan C. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Susan Davis (Calif.), Rep. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
The petitioners describe the current diversity disclosure requirement (Item 407(c)(2)(vi)) of Regulation S-X) as inadequate to determine racial and ethnic and even gender diversity in certain cases, but view it as complementary to their suggested approach. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 3:10 pm
Valle, Nos. 14-2710-cr and 14-4396-cr (2d Cir., Dec. 3, 2015) (2-1 decision), the majority concluded that there is equal merit to the narrow statutory interpretation announced in Nosal, and the diametrically opposed, broader interpretation set forth by courts disagreeing with Nosal. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:06 am
§ 924(c)), cert. denied, 133 S. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:21 am
§ 924(c)), cert. denied, 133 S. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 8:08 am
Leslie C. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:33 am
Ira C. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 10:24 am
Chief Judge Prost, writing for a panel that also included Judges Dyk and Hughes, found that Chief Judge Leonard Davis of the Eastern District of Texas erred by failing, among other things, to account for the “standard-essential status” of a Commonwealth Scientific (CSIRO) patent infringed by Cisco. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:12 am
C. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 1:24 pm
The draft Bill also includes a major expansion of the powers to require service providers (extended to include non-public service providers) to install specified technical capabilities, allied to most of the new warrants and communications data acquisition powers (see S.189). [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 1:24 pm
Includes a major expansion of the powers to require service providers to install specified technical capabilities, allied to most of the new warrants and communications data acquisition powers (see S.189). [read post]
