Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 341 - 360
of 5,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
§ 1125(c)(3)(C) by claiming its humorous use of the Jack Daniel’s marks was not pure commercial speech because it poked fun at the company in the Bad Spaniels design. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 5:06 am
" We know that when the marks are identical, a lesser degree of similarity between the involved goods is needed to support a likelihood of confusion refusal. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:58 am
In its latest judgment, LM (Demande reconventionnelle en nullité) (case C-654/21), the CJEU had the opportunity to further develop its case law on counterclaims for invalidity and revocation in response to an infringement action of an EU trade mark (see Art. 124(d) EUTMR and Art. 128 EUTMR). [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Selling and distributing Plaintiffs’ and the Class’s personal data in contravention of the GitHub Policies; c. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:02 pm
Smith has very good reasons to avoid these problems. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
’ §1125(c)(3)(A). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
’ §1125(c)(3)(A). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
’ §1125(c)(3)(A). [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
Opposition On 17 June 2020, Christopher Cooper wrote personally to Gau Ch. seeking information on how he might become a party “to reverse the actions of removal of parts of windows &c? [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:16 am
Steven C. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
Other postsTrade marksAnna Maria Stein considered the Italian Supreme Court decision on the protection of the Tic Tact box as a shape trade mark.Marcel Pemsel commented on the fact that Art. 8(5) and Art. 9(2)(c) EUTMR provide that claims based on a trade mark with a reputation can be asserted irrespective of the similarity of the goods and services represented.Image rights Eleonora Rosati discussed the recent decision of the Florence Court of First Instance on the… [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Ethics 567 (2011). [5] Ferric C. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
The defendant was deemed to ride on the coat-tails of the BOSS mark and to benefit from its reputation in the marketing of its goods. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
I've done so without regard to whether I agree with the lawyers' positions as a legal or moral matter; they apparently did a good job as lawyers, and my hat is off to them for that. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 4:50 am
Chair Gensler pointed out that these new rules mark the completion of 28 rules related to the SBS market since Dodd-Frank passed 13 years ago. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am
Ltd v Babco Forwarding & Shipping (UK) Ltd. [1978] AC 141 and hold that excise duty payable in respect of goods which are stolen in the course of international carriage by road cannot be claimed under article 23.44 of the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road 1956. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
§ 1052(c), which provides that a mark cannot be registered if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular living individual except by his written consent. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 6:30 pm
” §1125(c)(3)(A). [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:08 pm
It may also be a good time to conduct anti-harassment training to mitigate the risk of such a claim. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:30 am
So far, so good. [read post]
