Search for: "Mark Smith v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2007, 6:42 am
Attorneys for Bridgestone; Mark J.R. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:17 pm
Smith. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
Smith. 2015 BYU L. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:37 am
Earth, Wind & Fire IP, LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
(See the Ozimals ruling, “17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices” but see the Smith v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 3:21 am
See Smith v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:50 am
It also led to negotiations between Samuel Smith and Marks & Spencer which resulted in the settlement agreement, which prevents Marks & Spencer from selling Yorkshire Bitter under the old label. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
Nicola tells all.* Can the State automatically acquire ownership of your copyright? [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:42 am
Smith v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:32 am
Co., 82 NY2d at 453; see also Smith v General Acc. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Germany, Jr. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY V. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies… [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
Smith, the justices summarily ordered Arkansas to provide names of same-sex partners on birth certificates. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:33 am
Smith * Trademark Travesty of the Month–SMJ Group v. 417 Lafayette Restaurant * Online Message Board Protected by 47 USC 230–DiMeo v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:59 pm
Ms Hindley… denied any wrongdoing regarding Ms Smith and said the ‘alleged markings’ four months later had never been reported to her. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 6:15 am
Hapeman, 229 A.D.2d 807, 810, 646 N.Y.S.2d 583; Smith v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:33 am
Marks & Spencer. [read post]
