Search for: "Mark v. Wish"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
SeeOp. at p. 5 citing Carrender v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 10:12 am
(marked non-precedential). [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:42 am
One such case is Omega Engineering Incorporated v Omega S.A. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 8:55 am
Registrable shapes for 3D trade marks and designs. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 2:47 pm
" Chaplinsky v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
In the Western world, there is no wishing it away. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
Facebook, I wish I knew how to quit you. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:54 am
Never Too Late 292 [Week ending November 22] [Guest post] The Implementation of Article 17 CDSMD in EU Member States and the Evolution of the Digital Services Act: Why the Ban on General Monitoring Obligations Must Not Be Underestimated | Cannabis, conceptual comparison, and online evidence: Tertulia on EUIPO Boards of Appeal Case Law November 2020 | Mind the gap: Beijing IP Court explains the adverse effect clause of China’s Trade Mark… [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 4:05 am
Wisconsin Cheese Group, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:58 am
C. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:55 pm
In reading Justice Alito’s dissent in Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
`. . . prosperously yours, Mark Leitner. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 4:51 pm
A potential claimant who wishes to seek permission to issue proceedings anonymously (“an anonymity order”) in the KBD should do so at the same time as issuing the claim form and not before, according to the most recent edition of the King’s Bench Guide. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:44 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 11:00 pm
Also today, the 43(B)log discussed the Western District’s refusal to dismiss the plaintiff’s geographic misdescriptiveness claim in Baden Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
Wife asserted Husband wished to reconcile with her at the Vero Beach Property and wanted them to raise his minor son, who was born from an extramarital affair. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:13 am
In addition, the rule on limitation in consequence of acquiescence is intended to safeguard legal certainty, thus if the owner of an earlier mark has knowingly ‘acquiesced’ in the use of a later mark for a continuous period of five years, the proprietor of this latter mark must be legally certain that such use can no longer be challenged by the proprietor (at §48) It follows, as already held in the Budějovický Budvar (“Bud”) case… [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm
(emphasis added)Kraft Canada Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Mark Schweizer discusses Stowarzyszenie ‘Oławska Telewizja Kablowa’ v Stowarzyszenie Filmowców Polskich, ECLI:EU:C:2017:36, which addressed a preliminary ruling regarding the interpretation of Article 13 of the Enforcement Directive.Trader keeps the [good] faith in a spare part in trademark doublebillKatfriend Kevin Wong gives his insights on Audi AG v Lim Ching Kwang, [2017] SGIPOS 2, TM No. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
Both sides said that they were willing and indeed wished to embark on that course. [read post]
