Search for: "Marshall v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 4,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2010, 10:10 pm by Orin Kerr
John Marshall Harlan II represented the United States as an Assistant U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:13 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The language of colorblindness that Roberts and Thomas use to make their argument comes directly from Justice John Marshall Harlan's lonely dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87), the complaint herein sufficiently alleges a cause of action in negligence against the SLS defendants and the SLS employees (see Rivera v New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, 191 F Supp 2d at 421; see also Williams v State of New York, 84 AD3d 412). [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 4:07 am by Ezra Rosser
Ferguson, Justice John Marshall Harlan argued that in the United States, there was “no caste here. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 5:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Dissent in Harper v Virginia Board of Elections Justice John Marshall Harlan II authored a dissent, which was joined by Justice Potter Stewart. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:33 pm by Lawrence Solum
Loewy (Texas Tech University - School of Law) has posted Knowing 'Consent' Means 'Knowing Consent' - The Underappreciated Wisdom of Justice Marshall’s Schneckloth v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 12:53 pm by legalinformatics
Young of the Wayne State University Department of Communication has published The Ghost of Moby-Dick and the Rhetorical Haunting of the Ninth Court’s Anderson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 5:14 pm by David Oscar Markus
The state prevailed in the trial court, but the state appellate court ruled that the statute was unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Finally, having identified alternative procedural traditions on which Marshall could have drawn, and reviewed decisions by state and federal judges in analogous suits against officers, it concludes that Marbury’s deepest contribution was to elevate the principle of jurisdiction over the imperative of remedy in constitutional decision making. [read post]