Search for: "Martin v. Public Defender's Office"
Results 341 - 360
of 545
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:56 am
http://tinyurl.com/3p9d9yn (Chris Dale) How to Choose an eDiscovery Tool and eDiscovery Vendor - http://tinyurl.com/3e6jy35 (Dera Nevin) Jane Doe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled in Martin v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:35 am
A stark example: Martin v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 11:40 am
Martin H. [read post]
16 May 2022, 12:27 pm
From Schrader v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
’ Martin v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
Rostholder v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm
Astrue v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Law Society of British Columbia and Black v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 8:16 am
This approach was held to be valid under the federal Constitution in Martin v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:16 am
Martin O'Malley, who has been in office but two years, comes to the state Senate to demand repeal of the death penalty, armed with a report that should settle the issue. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, et al. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
“Fame, Property, and Identity: The Scope and Purpose of the Right Of Publicity”, Daniel J Gervais, Martin L. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:03 am
My buddy John Martin, head of the public defender’s appellate division here, had handled the federal case, and I complimented him on the rarity of winning in habeas. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm
Professor Volokh is concerned about an unusual development in Brummer v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
He defended Daniel Ellsberg in the 1971 Pentagon Papers case, and represents Joel Tenenbaum in a well-publicized music file sharing case, Sony BMG v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
My public speaking needed more work. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
The second case, IPCC v Warner ([2012] EWHC 271 (QB)) concerned an injunction prohibiting the defendants from disclosing documents and information which had been sent by the IPCC to the first defendant by mistake. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
