Search for: "Martin v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2009, 6:27 pm
Martin, 588 F. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 4:29 am
Then in the center of the monument is a map of Africa and the United States, which shows some of the places where South Carolina's African Americans' ancestors came from. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Supreme Court decisions based on the definition of acquittal set forth in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 10:24 am
Although it didn’t call it that, the concept of “sex plus” discrimination was first adopted by the United States Supreme Court in a 1971 decision involving Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in the case of Phillips v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:47 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 12:01 am
” Mississippi State Representatives still support the Confederacy – 2017 (AP Photo/Rogelio V. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:14 am
Fresh from a security scrub are these two items in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:35 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has noted this divide, but not staked out its position. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Second is Martin v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 9:09 pm
[Earlier I noted an event sponsored by the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit, entitled "The DC Circuit in the McCarthy Era: United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:25 am
Burgess, Martine M. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 6:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 9:23 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:10 pm
A couple of recent decisions by the Court of Appeals shed light on some very practical aspects of a criminal trial practice.Double Jeopardy and Child PornographyIn United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 8:04 pm
Cars are the most convenient mode of transportation across the United States. [read post]
19 May 2006, 3:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:03 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:14 am
July 27, 2010), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that under Section 10(b) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”), 15 U.S.C. [read post]