Search for: "Mattel Inc." Results 341 - 360 of 503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Think Tank) IEEE patent scorecard for 2008 is out (Innovationpartners) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent databases: 2008 in review (Patent Librarian's Notebook) New kind codes for republished PCT documents (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) The model changes at PatentFreedom; Matsushita is top troll target (IAM) Patent litigation, the ITC, and hardship in the chip industry (IP finance)   Global - Copyright Public domain day 2009 (Creative Commons), (Michael Geist)… [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 7:00 pm
  Five companies adopted a proposal that asked selected companies to report on their policies and procedures for minimizing customer exposure to toxic substances and hazardous components in marketed products: Best Buy Company; Mattel, Inc.; Pier 1 Imports; Target Corporation; and J.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 3:11 pm
According to the Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General: Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, along with the Attorneys General of 38 other states, reached a settlement agreement with Mattel, Inc., and its subsidiary, Fisher-Price, Inc., resolving a 15-month investigation into the events that lead to a voluntary recall of the companies' toys for excessive lead paint in 2007. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:43 pm
Earlier this year, firm co-founder and managing partner John Quinn won a jury decision establishing Mattel Inc.'s rights to the Bratz doll line, which was brought to market by another toy company. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 9:24 pm
The State of Florida is set to receive $587,000 as part of a multi-state settlement with toy maker Mattel Inc. and its subsidiary Fisher-Price Inc. after allegedly producing toys with unacceptably high levels of lead paint. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 8:01 am
Toy manufacturer Mattel Inc. will pay $12 million to 39 states in order to settle an investigation over lead-tainted toys made in China and sold in the United States in 2007. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 2:39 pm by Kenneth L. Kunkle
After leaving Mattel in 1998 for a stint in retail sales, Bryant claims to have conceived the dolls, he then returned to Mattel in 1999, only to defect with other Mattel employees in 2000. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court: Canwest v… [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Back in August, when Mattel won $100 million in damages from the federal jury that decided the company's copyright infringement case against MGA Entertainment Inc., the verdict was widely considered--including by us--to be a disappointment for Mattel, which had asked for more than $1 billion after the jury determined that MGA created its widely popular Bratz dolls based on designs by a Mattel employee. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:37 pm
A federal judge in Riverside, California, has granted Mattel, Inc., a sweeping injuction against MGA Entertainment Inc., the maker of the hugely popular Bratz dolls. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:01 am
Mattel, Inc.: A New Englander's Tale of Statutory Supremacy in Arbitration Law [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:28 pm
(Content Agenda) MPAA effectively shuts down largest fan edit movie site (Techdirt) Final judgment: SCO owes Novell millions (plus interest) (Ars Technica) Coupons, Inc drops DMCA lawsuit against coupon hacker (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) McCain responds to Jackson Browne lawsuit (Techdirt) Judge quashes subpoenas where Boston University could not identify John Does ‘to reasonable degree of technical certainty: London Sire Records v Does 1-4 (Recording Industry vs The People) (Ars… [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:43 pm
  The Ninth Circuit continued by recognizing that it had adopted the Rogers approach in the case, Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]