Search for: "Matter of A.D"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,063
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2008, 9:47 pm
Ackley, 169 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. 1991). [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am
Lawrence, 151 A.D.3d 1879, 1279 [2017]; Matter of Kessler v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 11:35 am
See Matter of Cale v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 9:44 pm
, 146 A.D.2d 572, 536 N.Y.S.2d 177 (2d Dept. 1989)). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
In Matter of Leroy v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
He argued that, as a matter of law, the court could not order him to pay child support to the mother, the noncustodial parent. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:23 am
Custody modification is also a delicate matter that requires significant changes in circumstances and the child’s welfare. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 5:47 am
The Bear Stearns Cos., Inc., 34 A.D.3d 300 (1st Dep’t 2006). [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
A.D. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
Memorandum: We previously held this case, reserved decision and remitted the matter to Supreme Court for compliance with Correction Law § 168-n (3), based on the court's failure "to set forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which it based its determination" (People v Long, 81 A.D.3d 1432, 1433). [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Public officers and employees may engage in outside employment, aka “moonlighting,” subject to certain restrictions and limitationsKastoff v NYS Dept. of Social Services, 195 A.D.2d 808"Moonlighting" has been a common practice in both the public and private sectors. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:33 am
Londono, 148 A.D.2d 753, 539 N.Y.S.2d 484 [2d Dept 1989]; see also People v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 2:22 pm
Co., 79 A.D.3d 450, 913 N.Y.S.2d 44 (N.Y.A.D. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 2:00 am
Toscano in her July 7th decision in Matter of C.A.B. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am
In Matter of Spires v Lighthouse Solutions, LLC, 4 Misc.3d 428, 778 N.Y.S.2d 259 (Sup. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
In re Will of Henderson, 253 A.D. 140, 145 (1937). [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The First Department declined to follow the interpretation of the Second Department which held that the ICPC applies to a nonrespondent parent living outside of New York (Matter of Alexus M. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
(Matter of Nazarianv. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:05 pm
Under these circumstances, it is clear that a dispositional hearing was necessary in this matter. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Another case, Aures v Buffalo Board of Education, 272 A.D.2d 664, presented a similar situation. [read post]
