Search for: "Matter of B M and P M" Results 341 - 360 of 1,597
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
There was a piece on the ICO’s website and the Mishcon de Reya Data Matters blog. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am by CMS
On receiving the image, the decoy replied “Wow, I’m only 13. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
If so, (2)are there any considerations which ought to negative or limit (a) the scope of the duty and (b) the class of persons to whom it is owed or (c) the damages to which a breach of it may give rise? [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
[P]ermitting a finding of malice based on an intent merely to inflict harm, rather than an intent to inflict harm through falsehood, "it becomes a hazardous matter to speak out against a popular politician, with the result that the dishonest and incompetent will be shielded. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
¶1 After nearly four years of contested litigation in a child custody case, the district court entered a default order against Michaela M. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm by Patricia Hughes
(A detailed table of permissible and out of scope areas is found in the FLSPL Paper, Appendix B, Tab 5.2.) [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 10:00 am by Guest Blogger
Neil SiegelSenator Kamala Harris’s eligibility to be a vice-presidential candidate has been questioned on the basis of an erroneous contention that she might not be a  “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II of the Constitution. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
(Practical Guide, supra, p. 28).The second, and perhaps more interesting caveat, touches on the alignment of the principles of the UNGP, and the regulatory systems around which lawyer ethical duties are developed and imposed (and consequently, the rules used to discipline lawyers for the quality of their interactions with clients and others). [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Resources Code, §§ 21167(b), 21152(a)) and exemption (§§ 21167(d), 21152(b)) are not exclusive, and serve a different purpose than § 21167.6, which aims to ensure meaningful judicial review in CEQA actions. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
Last month, the second chapter culminated with a first impression decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Joel M. [read post]