Search for: "Matter of Doe v Kelly"
Results 341 - 360
of 640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 5:19 pm
It does not require Congress to appropriate money annually. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:20 am
However, as his or her conviction is "res judicata"** -- the only issue to be resolved in the administrative disciplinary proceeding is the penalty to be imposed, which penalty must be consistent with the Pell doctrine [Matter of Pell, 34 NY2d 222].As the court held in Kelly v Levin, 440 NYS2d 424, if a jury finds a person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of, say, larceny, or the individual enters a plea of guilty to the larceny, a disciplinary hearing officer… [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 3:05 pm
Kelly, No. 17-CR-175-PP, 2019 WL 2137370 (E.D. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:30 pm
WHY DOES IT MATTER WHETHER OR NOT STUDENT LOANS ARE CONSIDERED CONSUMER DEBTS? [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Kelly (Pa. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 10:31 pm
Read on for why this should matter to you. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 10:31 pm
Read on for why this should matter to you. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 6:45 am
Vrchota Corp. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 1:26 am
Quick links June Kelly, BBC News: EU Settlement Scheme: Bogus marriage couples not being prosecuted. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[28] Because the twins fit into these portions of ICWA, the issues for determination by the Court were whether the state law definition of “domicile” should control, and whether under the ICWA definition of “domicile” the twins were non-domiciliaries on the reservation.[29] The Supreme Court recognized that the language of ICWA does not define “domicile;” and that the definition is a matter of Congressional intent.[30] … [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:30 pm
T. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:04 am
Ct. 1937 (U.S. 2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am
They wanted to use originalism to overturn Plessy v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:02 am
Mermeren v Fox. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:28 pm
In today’s case (Kelly v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
” Kelly Shackelford, Mary Beth and John Tinker and Tinker v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Does equity serve the role of bringing the formal structures of law closer to notions of justice? [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:58 am
Railway v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
iii ARGUMENT IN REPLY ............................................ 1 ARGUMENT I THE CIRCUIT COURT ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW IN DENYING MR. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm
“Why does it matter who’s claiming the right? [read post]
