Search for: "Matter of Hong v Hong"
Results 341 - 360
of 464
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 6:17 am
Hong v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:18 am
Paul v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Hong Kong amended its Patent Ordinance, June 27, 1997 and on February 22, 2008. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:54 am
When China was liberated by the Communist Party, it was with the overwhelming wishes of the populace as a whole, and the Party gave extensive rights and freedoms to people who previously enjoyed no such rights (as a matter of law under the emperors, and de facto under the corrupt Nationalist governments.) [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is RECARO North America, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
-Dallas 2001, no pet.); Hong Kong Dev., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
The first, was in the case of Ting Lan Hong v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 2995 (QB) – on which we have already commented. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
On 11 November 2011, in Hong v Persons Unknown, Tugendhat J granted the mother of Hugh Grant’s baby, Tinglan Hong an anti-harassment injunction banning photographers from approaching her home. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm
Galerie Enrico Navarra v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:02 am
He arrived wearing a black hooded cape and mask of a type featured in a British film about a pro-democracy activist of the near-future, V For Vendetta. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:58 pm
See SFAT’s Decision (Wan Ten Lok and Yan Kwok Ting Sunny v SFC, Application No 8 and 9 of 2009, para 197). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am
(Class 99) Component designs – General Court rules on informed user of a motor: Cases T 10/08 and T 11/08 Kwang Yang v OHIM – Honda (Class 99) Two stripes, three stripes and OUT: General Court decision in Case T-479/08 adidas v OHIM – Patrick Holding (Class 46) B&O speaker shape has appeal, so loses appeal: General Court decision in Case T-508/08 Bang & Olufsen v OHIM (IPKat) (Class 99) General Court upholds OHIM’s refusal of PAKI as… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm
FletcherMichigan State University College of LawStanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, ForthcomingMSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-20AbstractTribal consent to federal statutes, regulations, and cases that decide matters critical to American Indian people and Indian tribes long has been lacking. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:27 am
— Padilla no retroactive), Chang Hong (7th Cir. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
They must also ensure that the consideration they give to these matters is evident in their deliberations and documentation. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:47 am
Trucking Co., 59 NY2d 649, 650; Yao Ping Tang v Grand Estate, LLC, 77 AD3d 822; Zanani v Schvimmer, 75 AD3d 546, 547; Li Gang Ma v Hong Guang Hu, 54 AD3d 312, 313). [read post]
