Search for: "Matter of JAG" Results 341 - 360 of 442
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2010, 5:15 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
And I ran into this comment on the United States Air Force Academy Website, and it's apparently from the JAG Department: Will Bankruptcy Affect My Security Clearance? [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:52 pm by Kim Zetter and Kevin Poulsen
Manning’s family members have not responded to calls seeking comment about the matter. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:41 pm by Kevin Poulsen and Kim Zetter
But something struck me as odd with the van thing, and also the fact it was being stored in a JAG officer’s directory. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:18 pm by Stewart Baker
 The rise of JAG authority over every detail of warfighting means that the Pentagon would be exquisitely sensitive to arguable violations of international law in carrying out operations in cyberspace. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 6:31 pm by Kevin Poulsen and Kim Zetter
But something struck me as odd with the van thing, and also the fact it was being stored in a JAG officer’s directory. [read post]
22 May 2010, 8:56 am by thejaghunter
Does there exist in West Memphis, Arkansas a legitimate Grand Jury that can take these matters under investigation? [read post]
13 May 2010, 4:49 am by thejaghunter
Pettway has stood as foreman in front of at least 54 different Grand Juries Gary Pettway was aggressively reported as a criminal in related matters leading up to January 2010. [read post]
7 May 2010, 7:11 am by thejaghunter
It’s just a matter of who gets to grab the moral high ground during the opening rounds.) [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:41 am by Broc Romanek
The Clerk of the Court (a former Judge Advocate General of JAG) and the Court Marshall wore morning coats with tails (ie tailcoat). [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:32 pm by Dwight Sullivan
*Philip Sundel was an active duty Navy JAG, followed by a period as a legal advisor with the International Committee of the Red Cross, and is now a civilian in government practice. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:42 pm by Andrew Dat
  In short, the answer is maybe, or at the very least it’s enough of a violation to warrant a court to decide on the matter. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 9:06 pm by Editor
#1 Legal Underground#2 Likelihood of Confusion#3 Appellate Law & Practice#4 Law & Entrepreneurship#5 Conglomerate#6 South Carolina Trial Law#7 Jeremy Richey's Blawg#8 Crime & Federalism#9 JurisPundit#10 InternetCases.com#11 Al Nye The Lawyer Guy#12 Tech Law Advisor#13 Thomas Jefferson's Blog#14 Legal Commentary#15 Employment Blawg#16 Objective Justice#17 Greatest American Lawyer#18 The Common Scold#19 Patent Baristas#20 The Mommy Blawg#21 My Shingle#22 Blawg … [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:29 am by Buck Mann
As a practical and legal matter, most decisions by arbiters are not subject to that same judicial or appellate scrutiny. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:14 pm by Kenneth Anderson
Nor should it matter that the assassin “kills in the belief that he is acting in his own private or public interest”’ or whether the action is “surprising”’ or “secret. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm by Kenneth Anderson
Nor should it matter that the assassin “kills in the belief that he is acting in his own private or public interest”’ or whether the action is “surprising”’ or “secret. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 4:16 am by Stewart Baker
The military prosecutors are JAGs — and pretty much indistinguishable from the military defense counsel on the other side of the courtroom. [read post]