Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr"
Results 341 - 360
of 878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm
But why does the licensing agreement, or terms of service, matter? [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:05 am
See, e.g., Theofel v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
From Monday 23 until Tuesday 24 July 2012 is the appeal of The Catholic Child Welfare Society & Ors v Various claimants & Ors, to be heard by L Phillips, L Hale, L Kerr, L Wilson, and L Carnwath. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:41 am
(Ilya Somin) The Supreme Court today issued a unanimous decision in favor of the property owners in the important case of Sackett v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:27 am
Kerr, Four Models of Fourth Amendment Protection, 60 Stan. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 12:59 am
But that is a matter of form, not substance. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:35 am
Lord Dyson emphasised that the “focus should be on the substance of the matter”, and that “The Court should always keep in mind the importance of ensuring that the guarantees afforded by Article 6 (1) are not illusory” (para. 69). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
Lord Kerr dissented in a large number of Scottish cases — not only Martin v Her Majesty’s Advocate, but also Birnie et al v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2011] UKSC 55 and McGowan v B [2011] UKSC 54 — and in R v Gnango [2011] UKSC 59. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:03 pm
” Brinegar v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:11 am
(Orin Kerr) Yesterday the Fourth Circuit handed down an interesting Fourth Amendment decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:30 pm
In a new case, Alexander v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
The context is important. 11:29: Lord Kerr again questions the relevance of these submissions to this appeal. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Kerr queries why the prorogation needed to cover the conference recess. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:00 am
Grant, 2009 SCC 32 Kerr v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 3:33 am
In this post, Angus Maudslay, an associate in the litigation and arbitration team at CMS, comments on the decision of the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Fylde Coast Farms Ltd (formerly Oyston Estates Ltd)) v Fylde Borough Council [2021] UKSC 18, which concerns whether section 61N of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 should be interpreted to mean that an application for judicial review was made out of time. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:10 am
” At the Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Orin Kerr flags a cert petition that raises the question of “whether the voluntariness of consent to search or seize under the Fourth Amendment should be treated as a matter of fact or a question of law for purposes of the standard of review on appeal. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:32 pm
V. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm
One of the issues that has come up from time to time is why or whether ex ante restrictions matter. [read post]
