Search for: "Matter of M. M. v A. A." Results 341 - 360 of 15,515
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2024, 5:58 pm by Evan M. Hamme and Jack Thomas Camillo
Nov. 30, 2023). [1] 20 NYCRR 132.18(a). [2] Zelinsky v Tax Appeals Trib., 1 NY3d 85 (2003). [3] 20 NYCRR 132.18(a). [4] See TSB-M-06(5)I (May 15, 2006). [5] S. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
I'm certain that there are many people who would categorically agree with Justice Poochigian when he says in this opinion:"The interests of justice are not furthered by excluding truthful, relevant evidence needed to prosecute criminals. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
And of course, we know that this reactionary Court has its sights set on delegation because allowing broad delegation facilitates regulation, which is, of course, the ultimate target.Although I am always happy to be corrected when I'm mistaken and to acknowledge my errors, my characterization of Justice Kavanaugh's handwringing over unilateral agency action and paean to bicameralism and presentment probably was not mistaken--and certainly was not mistaken in any way that… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
McCormick of the Court of Chancery addressed an issue of first impression in Crispo v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
Hovenkamp is right that, as a general matter, Article III judges are not experienced at balancing costs and benefits in the way that general consideration of cross-market efficiencies might suggest. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 8:35 am by Samuel Bray
And the Court just granted cert in another equity case, Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:29 am by Verena von Bomhard (BomhardIP)
The other two are APE TEES (EUIPO v Nowhere, C-337/22 P) and SHOPPI (Shopify v EUIPO, C-751/22 P, see here and here)). [read post]