Search for: "Matter of S. G. v B. G."
Results 341 - 360
of 2,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
Some stuff that was just incomprehensible to me, like Section 33(b)(6), I now know why that was there, and I now know why other things are not there, like the fact that there is no definition in the statute of likelihood of confusion; or how one comes to own a mark; or secondary meaning... [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 12:03 pm
[v].) [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:23 am
Freebies Publ’g, 364 F.3d 535, 546 (4th Cir. 2004). [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
" As a matter of "[b]asic fairness," the playing field should be level. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
The necessary inference to be drawn from the express language of s. 95(2.4)(b) is that Parliament chose not to include a competition element in the financial institution exception. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 10:32 am
Plaintiff counsel’s desire to avoid an in-person trial, given his age (77 years old), and the contagiousness of COVID. b. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 7:40 am
The defendant, who had underlying health conditions, was not entitled to relief on a MAR under G.S. 15A-1415(b)(8) on the basis of his prison sentence being invalid as a matter of law as a form of cruel and unusual punishment due to the coronavirus pandemic. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:45 pm
In light of the Commission’s findings, the licensee elected to enter into a Consent Decree with the FCC to resolve the matter rather than face an extended FCC proceeding. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 8:16 pm
§§ 3729(a)(1)(G). [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
United States, Melvyn Gear, an Australian citizen who resides in Hawaii on an H-1B visa, asks the justices to decide whether Section 922(g)(5)(B) also requires proof of knowledge of collateral law. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 12:09 am
In the case G v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Amerada Hess Corp., 379 F.3d 32, 50 (2d Cir. 2004) (holding expert witness’s specific causation opinion that plaintiff’s squamous cell carcinoma had been caused by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons was unreliable, when plaintiff had smoked and drunk alcohol) Deutsch v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:16 am
See TPC §§ 71.0021(b),(c). [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 7:39 am
Kim v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
(Domestic Relations Law § 75–g[2]). [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
” (B) Risks to the Justice System What (if any) do you view as the greatest risk to our justice system at the moment? [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm
”[22]“Grave Danger” Finding in November ETS Is Flawed and InconclusiveAs one court explained, “[g]ravity of danger is a policy decision committed to OSHA, not to the courts. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:21 am
’” Meehan v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
