Search for: "Matter of Singh v Singh"
Results 341 - 360
of 512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Rajinder Singh]. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm
Such arbitrariness is usually avoided through compliance with what have become known as the “Hardial Singh” principles (taken from the judgment of Woolf J in R v Governor o Durham Prison, ex p Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704) – common law requirements that the detention must only be for the purpose of deportation, and that it must only be for a reasonable period in the circumstances. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am
Sharma v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:48 am
Singh said the third supplementary chargesheet will be filed in the first week of July.Find the orders passed by Justice Ajit Bharihoke in the above matters here;1. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
Shri Teja Singh, (1975) 1 SCC120. [read post]
15 May 2011, 12:22 am
Justice GangulyThe Supreme Court in Amar Singh v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:12 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Devi Rai v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:21 pm
The recent decision of the UK Court of Appeal in Bulbinder Singh v Jet Star Retail demonstrates some of the limitations of such clause, particularly because of the buyer's implied authority to dispose of the goods. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:08 pm
Singh, 428 F.3d 559, 582 (5th Cir. 2005); Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
Fourthly, there was a side debate about whether the summary of the Hardial Singh principles in R (I) v SSHD [2002] EWCA Civ 888 by Dyson LJ (as he then was) was accurate. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm
Particular concerns have arisen in the context of several recent cases involving comment on issues of scientific and academic debate (for instance the high profile case of Singh v British Chiropractors Association [2010] EWCA Civ 350). [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:44 am
In Gur Narain Das & Anr. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:06 am
Velusamy v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
A statutory defence of responsible publication on matters of public interest is also proposed. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
But it still applies in cases of justification (truth) and comment: as to the latter, see Lowe v Associated Newspapers [1997] QB 580 at [12-15], but also BCA v Singh [2011] 1 WLR 133 CA at [32] (and below). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
While the Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh had regarded it as an open question whether Reynolds applies to opinion, Lords Nicholls and Hobhouse had said in Reynolds ([2001] 2 AC 127, at 201 and 193-5 per Lord Nicholls and 237-8 per Lord Hobhouse.) that the expression of opinion was protected, if at all by, by fair comment. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:25 am
Condition 2: The opinion must be on a matter of public interest. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:03 am
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved.Matter of Wells v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:32 am
The matter has been listed for a mention next week. [read post]
