Search for: "Matter of State of New York v David D." Results 341 - 360 of 605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
The dissent also noted that the statute banned access to LinkedIn, Instagram, Reddit, Myspace, and the New York Times Web site. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:55 pm by Stephen Halbrook
In states like California and New York, DVROs are handed out like beads thrown from floats at Mardi Gras. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
This Court’s clarification of whether human health is the new actionable threshold for contamination and final resolution as to the corr-ect meaning of “non-natural” use is required to provide landowners, regulators and industrial actors across Canada with certainty around their 1 St Lawrence Cement Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am by David Oscar Markus
We didn’t want to be another group of schmuckstap-dancing Los Angeles or New York. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
[About the same as other rifles] Several federal and state courts are relitigating the constitutionality of "assault weapon" bans after the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am by Roshonda Scipio
AUTHOR Tushnet, Mark V., 1945- TITLE The constitution of the United States of America : a contextual analysis / Mark Tushnet. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We should not think of this as a new problem. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  There is an opinion piece in the New York Times entitled “Is Australia’s Meda too Prudish for a Sex Scandal”. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
Kramer and Neil MacFarquhar report for the New York Times. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Retain all appellate judges, then vote David Wecht for Superior Court and Kathryn Boockvar for Commonwealth Court. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Charley
If you own a multi-billion dollar company, it’s only a matter of time before someone comes out of the woodwork with a claim, and you’d better hope you have a lawyer who can protect your business. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Joshua Matz
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Testimony for the government by Antonio Rangel, Bing [yep] Professor of Neuroscience, Behavioral Biology, and Economics at the California Institute of Technology, was widely reported (see, e.g., The New York Times here and Bloomberg here). [read post]