Search for: "Matter of Welfare of C. Children"
Results 341 - 360
of 461
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2011, 10:18 pm
In the Matter of Shernise C., 2011 NY Slip Op 08355, 2011 N.Y. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:46 am
This requires focusing on “the safety, happiness, physical, mental and moral welfare of the children. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:12 am
Authors Note: In Matter of Allstate Ins. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:22 am
Authors Note: In Matter of Allstate Ins. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:28 am
That requirement stems from the deep-rooted but sometimes conflicting principles that “`parents have a constitutionally-protected, fundamental liberty interest in raising their biological children, even if those children have been placed in foster care[,]‘” and that “`the State’s parens patriae responsibility to protect the welfare of children . . . is limited to situations in which the state has demonstrated that the child’s… [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am
The Court concluded that, while s.11 requires chief officers of police to carry out their functions in a way that takes into account the need to safeguard and promote the welfare of children, that duty had been discharged. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:02 am
In each case section 1 of the Children Act 1989, enacted by Parliament, requires the welfare of the child to be paramount; that is more important than anything else. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
Issues continued to prevail, however,concerning Mother’s compliance with the orders of the juvenile court andconcerning the welfare of the children. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 4:35 am
Florida Statute 61.13(4)(c) provide the court with specific means to enforce the time-sharing schedule in the parenting plan. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:19 am
That simplifies the analysis of (a)—(c) above. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:26 pm
“An article published in the Journal of Social Policy in 2009” (p13): What is the Impact of Public Care on Children’s Welfare? [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 3:03 am
The national discussion on budgetary matters and proper expenditures of the federal government is enormously distorted. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
[N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)] See V.C., supra, 163 N.J. at 227-28; Hand v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:23 pm
As a result, the Court reversed the trial court’s decision and remanded the matter back to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the Appellate Division’s opinion. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Respondent did not contest registration of the Texas order, but requested that Family Court exercise temporary emergency jurisdiction based on her allegations that the paternal grandparents had sexually abused the children (Domestic Relations Law 76-c). [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
These are all matters for the DPP. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:42 am
Joan C. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
Simply because a foreign court has taken a particular view on any aspect concerning the welfare of the minor is not enough for the courts in this country to shut out an independent consideration of the matter. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:05 am
Parental rights are constitutionally protected, and the Division’s right to intervene is based on “the State’s parens patriae responsibility to protect the welfare of children. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
Sincerely, Christine C. [read post]
