Search for: "Matthew v. Smith" Results 341 - 360 of 444
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2007, 8:23 am
J. 20 *** Susan Power Johnston, CRAM-DOWN INTEREST RATES: DEVELOPMENTS FOLLOWING TILL V. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Smith, University of Montana Blewett School of LawPolitical Fair UsePeterman v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
On 4 November 2022, HHJ Paul Matthews allowed the application for an order to require the parties to comply with a third party debt order in Brake & Anor v Guy & Ors [2022] EWHC 2797 (Ch). [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Matthew, University of Colorado Law SchoolCourtney Anderson, Georgia State University College of Law Medha D. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
 A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said :   (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The court’s decision by Monroe County Commercial Division Justice Matthew A. [read post]