Search for: "Mazda Motor" Results 341 - 360 of 370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2014, 12:32 pm
Irvine, CA 92618949.727.1990Customer CenterPO Box 19734Irvine, CA 92623-9734800.222.5500CEO Jim O’SullivanDirector of Public Relations Jeremy Barns Chrysler Group 1000 Chrysler Drive Auburn Hills, MI 48326248.576.5741General Motors 300 Renaissance Center Detroit, MI 48265313.556.500CEO Mary Barra General Counsel Michael Milikin Mitsubishi Motors North American6400 Katella Ave. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:15 am by Max Kennerly
Mazda Motor, which held that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 208, which requires seat belts in the rear seats of passenger vehicles, does not preempt a state tort suit alleging that a minivan should have had not just a lap belt, but a lap-and-shoulder belt in a rear inner seat. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:08 am
Mazda Motor (08-1314), testing the right to sue auto makers over allegedly faulty seatbelts when a federal rule exists on such installations; Costco Wholesale v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Amanda Rice
Mazda Motor of America dominated coverage of the Court. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Mazda Motor that Federal auto safety standards didn’t pre-empt state claims, in that case one that car manufacturers should have installed lap-and-shoulder belts, rather than just lap belts, for rear seat passengers. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
Mazda Motor, Costco Wholesale v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 8:49 pm
British Columbia courts are not always receptive to engineering evidence being permitted in motor vehicle tort claims. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Mazda Motor Corp., in which the Court will consider whether federal regulations preempt a claim in state court for damages caused by a car manufacturer's failure to install a three point seat belt. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm by Law Lady
., a/a/o DENISE CHAPMAN, Respondent. 4th District.Civil procedure -- Default on motor vehicle lease -- Summary judgment -- Trial court properly entered summary judgment where there were no issues of material fact -- Remand for correction of scrivener's errorGEORGE C. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm by Law Lady
.'s offer was unreasonable when it could have been liable for its entire $10 million D&O policy limit, the 1st District Court of Appeal said.Insurance -- Automobile -- Comprehensive coverage -- Cancellation of policy -- Trial court erred in entering summary judgment for insurer in insured's action to recover benefits for losses sustained when his automobile was stolen on ground that policy had been cancelled for non-payment of premium prior to loss, where there was factual issue as to… [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:23 am by Edward Smith
Denair Head-On Crash Fatally Injures Two I’m Ed Smith, a Modesto wrongful death lawyer. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:16 pm by Edward Smith
3-Car Accident near South Lake Tahoe I’m Ed Smith and I’m a South Lake Tahoe Auto Accident Attorney. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by Edward Smith
Accident Fatally Injures Modesto Woman I’m Ed Smith, a Modesto personal injury attorney. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:23 am by Edward Smith
Honda Accord Battery Sensor Recall I’m Ed Smith, a Stockton car accident lawyer. [read post]