Search for: "McCann v. McCann"
Results 341 - 360
of 379
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
This is due in large part to a pair of rulings by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Warde-McCann v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 4:20 pm
The High Court considered Connors v UK and McCann v UK on the lack of procedural safeguard. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 12:18 am
People v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 2:32 pm
Anyway, Cosic v Croatia is a decision of the European Court of Human Rights that should be of interest as both Connors and McCann are referred to as the Court reaches its conclusion that a possession order was a disproportionate interference with the Applicant's Art 8 rights, because she was not given the possibility of having the proportionality and reasonableness of it tested. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:27 am
The ‘new’ factor in the present case was the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in McCann v UK 19009/04. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:27 am
The ‘new’ factor in the present case was the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in McCann v UK 19009/04. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
Oral Argument in case: 07-3737; Curtis, James v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
The defence was initially based on, as the Court of Appeal puts it, ‘the hope’ that Doherty in the Lords would adopt McCann v UK. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
Litigation and the Mobilization of Law , Michael McCann 33. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Sajar Plastics[7th Cir.]o 7th Defines Who Is A Supervisor Under Title VIIAndonissany v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 3:45 pm
McCann v UK (App. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
The European Court of Human Rights has made clear in Connors v UK (2005) 40 EHRR 9 and McCann v UK (19009/04), that each person faced with eviction proceedings should be able to have a court assess the proportionality of the proposed eviction and, whilst the House of Lords haven’t quite gone as far as this yet, in both Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465 and Doherty v Birmingham CC [2008] UKHL 57, they made clear that the approach… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:14 am
See also JCRA v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Their Lordships declined to vary or amend Kay v Lambeth in the light of this appeal or the last minute submissions on McCann v UK. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:32 pm
This will include their Lordships’ first take on McCann v UK. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 5:01 pm
In McCann v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 8:20 pm
There follows an interesting discussion of McCann. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:48 pm
Wos v Poland) was relevant. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:48 pm
Wos v Poland) was relevant. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Supreme Court, June 18, 2008 Munaf v. [read post]
