Search for: "McCoy v. McCoy"
Results 341 - 360
of 615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2010, 2:07 am
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 9 N.Y.3d 1, 8, 872 N.E.2d 842, 840 N.Y.S.2d 730 (2007) (quotation omitted); accord McCoy v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:38 am
" McCoy v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:45 am
Guayara v Harry I. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 3:48 am
In the first, the court held that McCoy’s various drug-related charges didn’t merge, but after State v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 5:35 pm
The defendant indisputably still gets to control whether he pleads guilty and/or have his counsel admit the offense at trial.)So, yes, the Court of Appeal is right that "this is not a case like McCoy where the defendant emphatically insisted he was innocent and consistently told his attorney to argue such at trial. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm
Elijah McCoy – Automatic railcar lubrication Elijah McCoy patented dozens of ways to lubricate machinery. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:29 am
Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 N.Y.3d 438, 442 (2007), quoting McCoy v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:55 am
A plaintiff seeking to recover damages for legal malpractice must prove that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302; Biberaj v Acocella, 120 AD3d 1285, 1286). [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:11 am
A plaintiff seeking to recover damages for legal malpractice must prove that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302 [2002]; Biberaj v Acocella, 120 AD3d 1285, 1286 [2014]). [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am
“A legal malpractice Claim accrues ‘when all the facts necessary to the cause of action have occurred and an injured party can obtain relief in court'” (McCoy v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:41 am
The proposed amendment failed to sufficiently allege that “but for” the defendants’ alleged negligence, the plaintiffs “would not have incurred any damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 49-50; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:51 am
That date was more than three years before the commencement of this action in June 2009 (see CPLR 214[6]; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301; Tsafatinos v Lee David Auerbach, P.C., 80 AD3d 749). [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:52 am
That date was more than three years before the commencement of this action in June 2009 (see CPLR 214[6]; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301; Tsafatinos v Lee David Auerbach, P.C., 80 AD3d 749). [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:55 am
McCoy (09-329) — Banks’ duty to notify credit card holders of interest rate increase for default. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:25 am
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 9 N.Y.3d 1, 8, 872 N.E.2d 842, 840 N.Y.S.2d 730 (2007) (quotation omitted); accord McCoy v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:12 am
Lucretia J.RICHMOND COUNTYHealth LawPatient Denied Motion For Rehearing Regarding Retention Order as Prior Retention Order ExpiredMatter of J.R.ESSEX COUNTYFamily LawGenetic Marker Testing Conclusively Prove Child's Paternity; Prior Acknowledgement VacatedMatter of McCoy v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
To establish a claim to recover damages for legal malpractice, "a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney 'failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession' and that the attorney's breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages" (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007], quoting McCoy… [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
"The Court of Appeals cited Gavigan v McCoy, 37 NY2d 548, Niebling v Wagner, 12 NY2d 314, and Mandle v Brown, 4 AD2d 283, affirmed 5 NY2d 51, as cases demonstrating the proposition that an employee cannot achieve a higher grade or salary by being assigned or engaging in out-of-title work "because this would violate the fundamental civil service tenet of advancement through competitive examination. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:27 am
Baures v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:14 am
William McCoy, a managing director at Morgan Stanley, described a number of commitments his firm has made towards a carbon neutral future. [read post]
