Search for: "Melendez"
Results 341 - 360
of 872
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2011, 9:19 am
Melendez-Diaz, SJC-10857.Huh? [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:33 pm
As discussed here, in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 8:10 pm
Evid. 412), Lusk (application of Melendez-Diaz), Fosler (whether Article 134? [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 6:11 pm
Evid. 412), Lusk (application of Melendez-Diaz), Fosler (whether Article 134? [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 11:38 am
With the exception of Melendez, the defendants in this matter have been arrested. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 11:38 am
With the exception of Melendez, the defendants in this matter have been arrested. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:51 pm
He, Wei Xing Chen, Xiaohong Xue, and Peter Melendez. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:44 am
Image via Wikipedia Bullcoming v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:20 am
Bullcoming appealed to the New Mexico Supreme Court, which, considering Melendez-Diaz, acknowledged that the report was testimonial but concluded that admission of the report was constitutional because (1) the certifying scientist was a "mere scrivener" and (2) the testifying scientist was a qualified analyst capable of serving as a surrogate. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Feliciano-Melendez, 2011 U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 1:13 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:13 pm
Melendez-Diaz was not the only crucial development in forensics in 2009. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:10 pm
WHETHER THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW IN DECLINING TO APPLY MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:51 am
Melendez-Diaz was a 5-4 decision. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:36 am
Their ruling followed from Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 9:58 am
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) and specifically held in Melendez-Diaz that forensic analysis is neither fool-proof nor immune from manipulation. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 9:41 am
The outcome of this case (when combined with Bullcoming and Melendez-Diaz) could create quite a shift in military courts-martial procedure. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:09 am
There is one post-Melendez case, the 4th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:33 am
” Finally, the Court cited Melendez-Diaz in finding that the State could not argue that the introduction of the lab report did not implicate the Confrontation Clause, as the report is undoubtedly an “affirmation made for the purpose of establishing or proving some fact” in a criminal proceeding. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
Professor Friedman, a true guru of “confrontation” issues notes: It appears that the next case in the Melendez-Diaz line will come very quickly. [read post]
