Search for: "Michael v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 12,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2017, 8:03 am
On April 6, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 10:30 am
Filburn: Agriculture, Aggregation, and Commerce (Constitutional Law Stories, Michael C. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 10:01 am
Theodore Eisenberg, Michael Heise, and Martin T. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 10:46 am
State v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:07 pm
Judge Karen V. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:22 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently dismissed the appeal in Comer v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 9:58 am
For publication opinions today (8): Michael R. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 8:34 am
Michael C. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:32 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm
United States being overruled. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
To discuss the case, we have Michael T. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:07 am
To discuss the case, we have Michael T. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
Michael Sozan at Center for American Progress: “[E]ven though the Supreme Court jettisoned a sweeping version of the [independent state legislature] theory to the dustbin of history, the post-Moore v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:53 pm
Fla.) in Valerie Flynn v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:45 am
Apt commentary from Cornell law professor Michael Dorf; from the opening paragraph: The positions staked out by the Court's most conservative Justices were themselves Trumpian, not so much in their audacity or mendacity but in their prolixity. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:17 am
Baze v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 2:28 pm
From today's majority opinion by Chief Justice Collins Seitz in Page v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 pm
But if so, that's still a triumph of consequentialist "living constitution" reasoning over originalism.The post Michael Rappaport on "the Originalist Disaster" of the Supreme Court's Ruling in Trump v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 5:02 am
The post JORDAN v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:30 pm
In United States v. [read post]
