Search for: "Miller v. People"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,846
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2019, 7:29 am
Miller that he was giving up his rights was “as good as the plea bargains might sound to people, nobody is under an obligation to accept them. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
If you know people who work at the different institutions listed above, feel free to contact them to thank them for their contribution to our site or to learn how you can support them. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:56 pm
Relying solely on a criminal case citing a personal injury case – both of which dealt with minimum constitutional requirements for memorandum opinions of appellate courts to “state reasons for the disposition” (see People v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:53 pm
Malvo, No. 18-217: In Miller v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 7:36 am
Miller of Duke Law School, they filed an amicus brief in support of neither side in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 12:39 pm
Photo by Shawn Miller/Library of Congress. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:27 pm
Not three.Ten different Ninth Circuit judges recuse themselves from the en banc call: Judges McKeown, Wardlaw, Bybee, Bea, Watford, Owens, Friedland, Miller, Collins, and Lee.So it's an opinion that may affect at least a nontrivial number of people in a particular socioeconomic group. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:55 pm
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
The court of appeals vacated the sentence, concluding that the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard by focusing on the nature of the offense and not whether the defendant was, within the meaning of Miller v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
The unanimous decision by Lady Hale and Lord Reed, R (Miller) v Prime Minister, [2019] UKSC 41 (Miller (No 2)) breaks new and, in my view, shaky constitutional ground. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
” (Last quoting Jensen v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
The phone hacking saga continues with Byline Investigates reporting that Sienna Miller and Sir Simon Hughes have launched claims against the Sun. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
First, the criminal defamation statute arguably fails to provide "people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to understand what conduct it prohibits" and what speech is acceptable…. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 1:56 pm
about the "kill zone" theory in the recent case of People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 1:28 pm
In 2012, in Miller v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:04 am
Supreme Court decided in Miller v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
” Adding to the old adage of people, process and tech is a smart move. [read post]
