Search for: "Miller v. Superior Court"
Results 341 - 360
of 521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
In the words of the Fifth District Appellate Court in Schofield v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Indeed, Eugene V. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 11:18 am
In Latinos Unidos de Napa v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:53 am
South County Citizens for Smart Growth v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:59 am
As a result, the court relied heavily on the older California Supreme Court case of Miller v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
Superior Court, Supreme Ct. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:09 pm
This holding conflicts with the holding and reasoning of the Third District Court of Appeal in California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
” (Kim v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:37 am
(For more of Justice Quinn’s particular style, Miller v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:12 am
[3] See, e.g., Miller v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:12 am
[3] See, e.g., Miller v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 1:40 pm
Superior Court (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 889, the California Infill Builders Federation (Infill Builders) submitted an August 16, 2013 letter to the high court requesting that the opinion be depublished pursuant to Rule 8.1125 of the California Rules of Court. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
” The Court distinguished and explained its own prior decision in Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) I recently read an interesting tort case, Stephens v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:31 pm
The Superior Court of Stanislaus County, City of Ceres, et al. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm
The Sixth District Court of Appeal recently presided over such a conflict in Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:59 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
6 May 2013, 1:54 pm
Some Guy v. [read post]