Search for: "Miner v. Miner" Results 341 - 360 of 2,177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2021, 5:09 am by Charles Sartain
  Answer: As many as they want, but the court will only use one, says King Operating et al v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:04 am by John McFarland
Our firm hosted its 4th land and mineral owner seminar last Friday, and I spoke on deductability of post-production costs from lease royalties in light of the Texas Supreme Court’s decision last year in Chesapeake v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:16 am by WIMS
Chesapeake owns lease rights to minerals beneath the Whitemans' surface property. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 4:47 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Appellate Division dismissed a challenge to a special permit, when the petitioner delayed bringing an Article 78 proceeding while the recipient of the special permit continued with construction. in Matter of Miner v. [read post]