Search for: "Minor v. Black"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,015
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2013, 7:20 am
The following contribution to our Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:30 am
Moreover, property law weaknesses gave leverage to civil rights opponents of covenants, long before Shelley v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:30 am
He showcases leaders such as Everett Dirksen, Hubert Humphrey, and Richard Nixon who insisted on real change, not just formal equality, for blacks and other minorities. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
The case was Shelley v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 1:41 pm
” 66% were minorities. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
In Nielsen v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:32 am
V. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:57 am
It just changed a couple of minor lines of an opinion by Justice Ashmann-Gerst, after all. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm
In Farrakhan v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
"The pipeline, plaintiffs claim, is designed to exclude Black and Latinx students from the City's prime educational opportunities. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
"The pipeline, plaintiffs claim, is designed to exclude Black and Latinx students from the City's prime educational opportunities. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 10:51 am
Many of the nation's schools, the Court has been told, are still segregated by race (due largely to housing patterns) - with more than a third of the country's black and Latino students attending schools that are 90 percent or more minority. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 1:22 pm
But, in Baldwin County v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm
A couple tried to purchase a home from a developer, and the developer refused to sell it to them because the man was black. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
While we know from Reno v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
On April 27, we are going to court to put an end to SB 7066 for good.In this case, Jones v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm
In the 1983 case of Karcher v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 11:22 pm
There is actually a good deal of Supreme Court precedent on this point (the leading modern case is Village of Arlington Heights v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:55 am
Kentucky when state prosecutors struck all four prospective black jurors, offering “race-neutral” reasons, and it was later discovered that the prosecution had (1) marked with green highlighter the name of each black prospective juror; (2) circled the word “BLACK” on the questionnaires of five black prospective jurors; (3) identified three black prospective jurors as “B#1,” “B#2,” and “B#3”;… [read post]
