Search for: "Montana v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 1,057
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
Montana Department of Revenue, 18-1195 Issue: Whether it violates the religion clauses or the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution to invalidate a generally available and religiously neutral student-aid program simply because the program affords students the choice of attending religious schools. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:30 am by Unknown
The United States is the only industrialized nation that doesn’t have a law requiring paid vacation. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:56 am by Amy Howe
Moath Hamza Ahmed al-Alwi’s lawyers say that he was in Afghanistan when the United States began its bombing campaign there after the September 11 attacks, but quickly fled to Pakistan, where bounty-hunters turned him over to the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by John Elwood
Atlantic Richfield said federal law pre-empted those claims, but the Montana Supreme Court disagreed. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:58 am by Amy Howe
The government recommended a grant in Thole v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of Herrera v Wyoming An 1868 treaty between the United States and the Crow Tribe promised that in exchange for most of the Tribe’s territory in modern-day Montana and Wyoming, its members would “have the right to hunt on the unoccupied lands of the United States so long as game may be found thereon . . . and peace subsists . . . on the borders of the hunting districts. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
Leland Sycamore, Tyler Sycamore, Wild Grains Bakery LLC and United States Bakery, Inc. 2:13-cv-00749-DN. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am by Marci A. Hamilton
Massachusetts, which held that states have the power to make vaccination compulsory in the public interest and the 1944 decision in Prince v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:59 am by Aurora Barnes
Montana Department of Revenue 18-1195 Issue: Whether it violates the religion clauses or the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution to invalidate a generally available and religiously neutral student-aid program simply because the program affords students the choice of attending religious schools. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Does an Indian Tribe have authority under the second exception of Montana v. [read post]